Hey Guys,
I have seen alot of sites that say watercooling is way more efficient than air cooling. This would make sense, considering water conducts heat more efficiently than air.
But here's my question: since water cooling and air cooling both must use a radiator-type device to release heat energy to the AIR, wouldn't they have save effectiveness? The processor in a watercooling would have cooler temps at first, until all the water in the system heated up to a temperature dictated by the heat dissipation rate of the radiator.
As I see it, the increased effectiveness of watercooling lies more in the fact that larger radiators can be constructed because the radiator is not hanging directly on the mobo.
Am I missing something obvious, or does this idea make sense?