Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Total Beffudlement: Venice vs Clawhammer

  1. #1
    Fresh Paint
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    23

    Default Total Beffudlement: Venice vs Clawhammer

    I was browsing newegg for a new processor, and I came up with 2 versions of the 3500+, the venice core and clawhammer. Does anyone know the difference? I'm really just shooting for the cooler/better overclocker.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    The SlackMeister
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    815

    Default Re: Total Beffudlement: Venice vs Clawhammer

    Venice is a much better OCer. go with it.

  3. #3
    Overclocked Xbrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Gold Coast , Australia
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: Total Beffudlement: Venice vs Clawhammer

    definately the venice
    "Hey look, the topic!! It's getting away! Quick catch it! *running* Must *running more* get on *panting* TOP...IC!!!! *collapses* "-Temmink
    Intel Q9450 @ 3.2GHz
    Asus P5E3 Premium WiFi
    OCZ Platinum PC3-12800 1600Mhz XTC 4Gb 7-7-7-24
    2 x Powercolor HD4870 512Mb in Crossfire
    Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme with Noctua 120mm 1300RPM Pressure Optimised Fan
    Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit w/ SP1

  4. #4
    Fresh Paint
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    23

    Default Re: Total Beffudlement: Venice vs Clawhammer

    Thanks guys. Now I can finally go to sleep without those dreams of *these aren't the cores you're looking for* o.O

  5. #5
    Water Cooled
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Arizona, USA
    Posts
    743

    Default Re: Total Beffudlement: Venice vs Clawhammer

    there is no core
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
    - Unknown

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •