I'd still race you in my jeep
And i'd probably win right up to 40~45mph.
motor trend says 6.6 to 60mph on your camaro
jeep bumps to 60mph in 5.9 if its in 4WD (Hi-pass) with the rear interlocker engaged.
but it'll get to 40mph in a little under 4.3 seconds or about.
You also weigh more then i do fully loaded.The numbers on this car are remarkably similar to Camaros we've tested in the past. With 323 horsepower available from the 3.6-liter V-6, we would expect some startling acceleration numbers. Unfortunately, our test car weighed in at 4105 pounds. Meaning that our ponycar just barely beats an everyday sedan like the Toyota Camry in power-to-weight ratio. Sadly, the Camaro's 6.6-second 0-60 run is also slower than the 6.1-6.3-second 0-60 runs we recorded with Camry V-6s in the past. It is also nearly 400 pounds heavier than a recently tested Mustang V-6 convertible. This might explain why the Camaro is a tenth of a second slower to 60 than the Mustang with 18 less horsepower. The Mustang holds that 0.1-second advantage in the quarter-mile, turning in a 14.8-second run at 95.3 mph while the Camaro was only slightly slower at 14.9 seconds at 94.7 mph.
Let alone if i take off the doors, roof, windshield, rear tire, rear tail gate, rear seat, and tool boxes. I can probably shed 400 pounds of that weight.
(not my jeep but i've done that to mine....roll cage comes off as well)
My 1/4 mile times would be hilarious though, you'd smoke my ass like a joint. I'm guessing mid 19's into the low 20's
Jeep just has nothing left to give at about 65mph. (but that sh@# will climb a mountain of camaros with ease)
[edit]
you know i think i can switch from 4 L to 4 H on the fly while driving, but i'll be damned if im trying it on the jeep hahahaha.