Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

  1. #1
    Overclocking Guru Trace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,077

    Default Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

    I want to build a new system, and I was wondering just what the differences between a sever processor and a desktop processor are.

    Would I see gaming performance decrease by using a Quad Server Core or a Quad Desktop Core?

    I wanted to build a dual socket server core and have 8 physical cores.

    Thoughts?
    Quote Originally Posted by Lothair View Post
    I guess it's just widely used and has had some of the best people in the world work on it, costing a ridiculous amount of money, for no actual reason. :/
    Have you checked out the front page lately?
    Projects:
    Moe's Tavern | Sponsored by: Mimo Monitors, Crucial, Thermaltake
    Book Of Knowledge

  2. #2
    If it isn't stock, it's modded! slaveofconvention's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, UK
    Posts
    2,816

    Default Re: Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

    Very few games take advantage of more than one or two cores, those few that do are set up for 4 cores max - I wouldn't imagine 8 cores would make a big difference, other than to your bank balance after the build.

    Current Projects: Lobo | Unimatrix | High Voltage | Antec 900 Revamp (Phase 2)
    Completed Projects: General Lee | Synergy Green | Liquid Yellow
    Planned Projects: K-9-PC | Limey

  3. #3
    Overclocking Guru Trace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,077

    Default Re: Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

    So stay with my Q6600 for a while longer?
    Quote Originally Posted by Lothair View Post
    I guess it's just widely used and has had some of the best people in the world work on it, costing a ridiculous amount of money, for no actual reason. :/
    Have you checked out the front page lately?
    Projects:
    Moe's Tavern | Sponsored by: Mimo Monitors, Crucial, Thermaltake
    Book Of Knowledge

  4. #4
    If it isn't stock, it's modded! slaveofconvention's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, UK
    Posts
    2,816

    Default Re: Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

    I'm running a Q6700 and have no plans to upgrade for quite some time lol

    I think the only upgrade it'll get will be to the former top-of-the range 775 CPU just before they discontinue them, and before they get rare and stupidly priced :p

    Current Projects: Lobo | Unimatrix | High Voltage | Antec 900 Revamp (Phase 2)
    Completed Projects: General Lee | Synergy Green | Liquid Yellow
    Planned Projects: K-9-PC | Limey

  5. #5
    Will YOU be ready when the zombies rise? x88x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    MD, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Default Re: Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

    The difference between s775 Xeons and C2Qs are pretty much nill in terms of actual use. The only difference is that the Xeons will often have more thermal headroom.

    As for having dual quads, slave's right; you won't really see any improvement in gaming performance, but if you're gonna be doing other stuff, you might.

    One other thing to think about if you want to do a dual socket board, is that most dual-775 boards require FBDIMMs, which are more expensive and slower, because they do so much error checking.

  6. #6
    Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus Technochicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    386

    Default Re: Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

    The main difference between s771(servers) and 775(desktops) is that 771 cpu's have 2 front side buses, so they can communicate with each other as well as the other components.

  7. #7
    Overclocking Guru Trace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,077

    Default Re: Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

    I was going to go AMD opteron's with DDR2 (I think)
    But I wanted to be able to multi multi task
    and Im pretty sure I've killed this Q6600 with Electrical Degradation.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lothair View Post
    I guess it's just widely used and has had some of the best people in the world work on it, costing a ridiculous amount of money, for no actual reason. :/
    Have you checked out the front page lately?
    Projects:
    Moe's Tavern | Sponsored by: Mimo Monitors, Crucial, Thermaltake
    Book Of Knowledge

  8. #8
    Will YOU be ready when the zombies rise? x88x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    MD, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Default Re: Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

    With Opterons, make sure that if the MBB requires it, that you're using registered/ECC RAM. It's also more expensive than normal RAM (again with error checking/etc), but most multi-socket MBBs won't work without it.

  9. #9
    Overclocking Guru Trace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,077

    Default Re: Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

    Alright, thanks for the input guys!
    Quote Originally Posted by Lothair View Post
    I guess it's just widely used and has had some of the best people in the world work on it, costing a ridiculous amount of money, for no actual reason. :/
    Have you checked out the front page lately?
    Projects:
    Moe's Tavern | Sponsored by: Mimo Monitors, Crucial, Thermaltake
    Book Of Knowledge

  10. #10
    Wait, What? knowledgegranted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    569

    Default Re: Server Processor Vs. Desktop Processor

    I think there is something missing here; Server processors are also meant to be a lot more stable than the generic desktop processor. They are *sometimes* under volted and under clocked.
    It's like JFK announcing the moon mission. He had no expertise in space travel, and no way of knowing if it would work. He just announced "we're going to the moon" and then they made it happen because everyone was on the same page and working towards the same goal. If he had said "well, let's get some people in space, and we'll see how far out we can get, and if I find someone to make a rocket strong enough, we could possibly approach the moon's orbit and maybe land" it wouldn't have happened.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •